##### ###### ##### ### # # ### # # ###### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ##### #### ##### # # # # # # # #### ## # ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ## # ###### ## ### # ### # ######
##### ###### ##### ### # # ### # # ###### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ##### #### ##### # # # # # # # #### ## # ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ## # ###### ## ### # ### # ######
##### ###### ##### ### # # ### # # ###### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ##### #### ##### # # # # # # # #### ## # ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ## # ###### ## ### # ### # ######
We want to count valid deletion sequences. The main difficulty is that the graph edges are not enough by themselves. The order of deletions also matters.
Think about one operation on an edge with . This operation is allowed only after every vertex between them, meaning , has already been deleted.
So if vertices and are paired together in the final sequence, then the whole interval must be completely deleted before deleting and .
This creates a recursive interval structure.
For example, suppose the first vertex of an interval is , and in the final sequence it is deleted together with vertex . Then edge must exist. Also, before deleting , all vertices from to must already be deleted.
The vertices from to are outside this edge. They can be deleted before or after different operations inside , as long as their own rules are respected.
This suggests a dynamic programming over intervals.